River Visions of a Midwestern Manhattan

[Image: Floating homes].

The reliably excellent Brand Avenue reported last month that "business leaders" in Tulsa, Oklahoma, "are proposing a massive change to that city's riverfront: a series of new islands covered with public parks and plazas, residential high-rises, and retail arcades, all made possible by the construction of a massive new dam just upstream."
The project, built upon the alluvial bends of the Arkansas River, will cost nearly $800 million.

[Image: Aerial view of the Channels].

Referred to as the Tulsa Channels, the scheme is meant "to propel the Tulsa region past its competitors," stunning them all with unapologetic geotechnical ambition. For instance, the whole thing "begins with an impounding dam at the 23rd street bridge." This, in turn, "creates a 12.3-mile lake north to Sand Springs."
At that point:
    A 40-acre, man-made island located between the 11th and 23rd street bridges, itself connected by two bridges to the east bank, rises up from the water and anchors the project. The man-made land mass features low- and high-rise residences to the north and south, separated by navigable canals from the public zone.
The whole thing may even help underwrite its own construction costs through the future sale of electricity. Indeed: "Plans call for the project to generate excess energy from hydro, solar and wind power that can be sold back to the power grid for profit."
It's not just a suburb, it's a machine.

[Image: The Tulsa Channels. Two views of a very Manhattan-like model].

Designed by Vancouver-based architects Bing Thom, the Tulsa Channels takes its place alongside another of that firm's more hydrologically inclined landscape projects: the Trinity River Vision. This is "a master plan for the Trinity River and major tributaries" in Fort Worth, Texas.

[Image: The Trinity River Vision by Bing Thom. The project "will enable up to 10,000 new homes to be constructed in the area (...) once flood protection is in place and levees are removed to open up the land" – as well as once a "new bypass channel and its related dam and isolation gates" have been constructed].

Brand Avenue – whose original post I've more or less repeated, step by step, in its entirety here (sorry!) – points out that these projects bear much in common with yet another riverine plan: this time for a series of manmade islands off the Mississippi coast of St. Louis, as reported by the Forum for Urban Design.

(Note: While you're reading Brand Avenue, check out their post on the container city).

Comments are moderated.

If it's not spam, it will appear here shortly!


Anonymous American said...

Wow....those pictures of the model look stunning. Amazing how much time and effort is put into models these days.

December 07, 2006 11:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting notion. With a Vancouver firm doing this, it seems they're working on creating a kind of second Vancouver in Oklahoma. I loved the water taxis and the whole intimacy of False Creek. Now, if they'll just drop a soccer stadium in there for an MLS team, I'd be extatic.

December 07, 2006 1:58 PM  
Anonymous cenoxo said...

Dam, looks like another soggy chapter of FLW writ large. Anyone for floods (not to mention tornadoes?)

The warmly illuminated Channels model does look nice against that calm, cool, blue plastic Arkansas River, though.

Wonder how many of those incoming worker bees can afford to boldly live arup on the Island of Excitement?

December 08, 2006 3:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a resident of Tulsa I want to point out that the project calls for $700 million from taxpayers, while owners put up only $100 million. Oklahomans have a name for this:

Boondoggle

Not to mention that the Indian tribes own the river bed, and nobody asked them.

December 11, 2006 10:24 PM  
Blogger Brian Dunbar said...

Former resident of Tulsa and occasional reader of Bldgblog here.

All said and done what you've got is the Arkansas River all bottled up and . it's the Arkansas; neither as nice or as blue as the pictures make out. Think ... brown. And warm in the summer. Plus the upstream users dumping (treated) wastewater.

All said and done Tulsa is in a rather arid patch of the world. Creating a water feature where nature would not put it might work in someone's back yard, but set on a city-wide scale .. no.

To, this has been done before - visions of The Future in the 70s caused a dam to be built, a railroad bridge turned into a pedestrian bridge .. etc. Grand visions of sailing on the river in the dusk. We got a rather nice park out of it but nothing you'd care to swim or boat in.

December 13, 2006 7:53 PM  

Post a Comment